SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT OUR POLITICAL PARTIES: AND A THESIS FOR SUCCESS IN CORRECTING THEM

Jerit Adamson Fourman, Ashland, Oregon.
handdrawnstars.net
Sep 6, 2008 | 4:55 PM PST

Were the Federalists the first party to organize after the Declaration of Independence? Did Alexander Hamilton have any ties to the international private central banking dynasties of Europe? Were they the reason he acquired the office of Secretary of the Treasury? Would it be an accurate representation of their platform to say that it consisted of three main planks: 1) strong federal government 2) weak state governments and 3) a private central bank: Would that be an accurate statement about the Federalists?

Why aren't more of us talking about the significance of the name of the party which arose in opposition to the Federalists, the Democratic Republican Party?

Why aren't we talking about this simple thesis: "Today's Democrats and Republicans are the divided and conquered remains of the Democratic Republican Party, believe it or not, which arose in opposition to the Federalists. The Federalists advocated strong central government, limited state governments, and curiously, a private central bank. They were the party of, by, and for the international private central banking cartels. These owe allegiance to no nation on Earth. Neither did Hamilton. Neither do the Federalists. When we want to know who is destroying the United States, we would begin well by learning about the Federalists.

[Thesis continued]

"Thomas Jefferson (who warned "if the Americans ever allow private banks to control the issuance of currency . . . they will deprive [them] of all property until they wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered") and, later, James Madison (who rewrote Paine's RIGHTS OF MAN into the Bill of Rights) formed a party of opposition to the Federalists, the now forgotten Democratic Republican Party. The platform of the Democratic Republicans was the point-by-point opposite of the Federalists. Whereas the Federalists advocated a strong federal government, the Democratic Republicans advocated a limited one. Whereas the Federalists advocated limited state governments, the Democratic Republicans advocated strong ones. And whereas the Federalists advocated, outrageously, a private central bank, the Democratic Republicans advocated NO PRIVATE CENTRAL BANK.

[Thesis continued]

"Although the Federalists lost, and the Federalist Party was disbanded, their agenda continues to advance through today's Democrats and Republicans. The federal government continues to grow stronger. State governments continue to suffer their sovereignty to be violated by the federal government, i.e., they continue to grow weaker and become more and more limited in their powers of opposition, especially through increasing dependence on federal money. And we are currently living under this nation's THIRD private central bank. Interestingly, the first two banks both fell, the first from internal board-member loans to each other, which they multiplied by means of the fractional reserve system, the second from persistent attack by President Andrew Jackson (whose tombstone bears his proudest accomplishment: "I KILLED THE BANK.")

[Thesis continued]

"It is obvious what happened. The Federalists went underground and, through infiltration, divided and conquered the Democratic Republican Party into today's Democrats and Republicans. Understand when discussing failures of Democrats and Republicans to protect our republic from our democracy (to protect us in the minority from the will of them in the majority) regard Democrats and Republicans doing so as Federalists!

[Thesis continued]

"In order to oppose them, re-unite the Democrats and the Republicans into the Democratic Republican Party, educating the uninformed about its origins, and call those who oppose you by their original name, Federalists!"

Thus far, for some lamentable reason, this thesis has fallen on deaf ears.

I invite anyone reading this to look into the questions I have asked, see whether or not the answer to all of them is YES, as my research indicates that it is, and then educate each other.

Thank you.